Views of Christianity and Islam Towards Trade

Christianity and Islam argon dickens of the most practiced faiths in the world, and have been for centuries. These twain faiths atomic number 18 both mo nonheistic, which means they worship cardinal beau ideal, or Allah. Started over 2000 years ago, Christianity is based on the teachings and life of messiah Christ and was expand throughout the Ro earth Empire. The religion of Islam began azoic in 600 C. E. by the prophet Muhammad, and he spread the word of Allah. These religions spread readily in Europe and the Middle East. As they progressed, new commerce routes came about in these beas.extra time, Christianity and Islam developed opinions about the trading and line of credites bodily function and the pot who pursued it. According to the religions holy books, the Bible and Quran, their views on mete out were different at offset. Christians considerd that throng should not grapple for it was not the interestingness of gentlemans gentlemankind. Muslims were much to a greater extent tolerant of switch, as ache as merchants were middling in their bargaining. By 1000 C. E, both the religions attitudes towards throw had permuted completely. Christian scholars began to teach that honest deal was acceptable, opus Muslim scholars axiom the peril that switch brought to a mans soul.By the 15th century, attitudes towards take had even more drastic change once again. Christianity espo exampled that trade was encouraged and worthy, while Muslims believed merchants were taint. When the two religions send-off began, Christianity and Islam differed at first on their views concerning trade. As stated in the Christian Bible, it is almost impossible for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God ( history 1). For Christians, at first they had to live a scurvy life without making any winningss.Its verbalise that it was easier for a camel to go through the inwardness of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. As for Musli ms this differed because in the Quran, men were allowed to trade as extensive as they were honest say in written enrolment 2. If the two parties speak the legality and make it manifest, their transaction shall be blessed, and if they turn back and tell and lie, the blessing of their transaction shall be obliterated. This means that if two people trade fairly amongst each other without cheating, and so nothing is wrong according to the Islam beliefs.If one of the men are cheated, then their business will be wiped out. The point of history 1 was that Jesus was a poor people man, therefore his followers lived up to existence poor as well. When Christianity started, Christians believed that in mark to go to heaven, they mustiness live a poor and humble life, like Jesus did. The same logic applies for Muslims in document 2, whos founder Muhammed was a flush merchant. In document two, the author is supporting merchants and saying that they will be genuine by Allah as long as they are truthful.Muslims strongly believed that it was okay to be a wealthy merchant as long you are honest, like Muhammed. Therefore, the two religions were at first different because Christianity had disallow views toward trade while Islam was for it and they were alike because the primer for their views both traced back to their founders. In documents intravenous feeding and five, the view points of Christians and Muslims toward trade began to change. Christians, who were at first against trade and become wealthy from it, in a flash say that it is okay to trade as long as you are honest.Stated in document four, No man should conduct a thing to another man for more than its worth. This is saying that for men to do business with one another, they must not sell things for more than they are worth, or in other words pinch each other. While Christian scholars are becoming more lenient towards trade than they were when the religion started, Islamic scholars are becoming more strict. Muslims now believe that interchange things for a profit, even if it is honest, is inevitably modify the soul. These qualities lead to a decrease and weaken in virtue and manliness, (document five).The Islam look on trade now sees that the methods that trade employs are tricks aimed at making a profit by securing the difference between buy and selling prices. The two religions, however, are lock away somewhat similar because they both believe that trading for large profits give the sack eventually lead to corruption of the soul. Views of trade by Christians and Muslims yet continued to change even further in documents six and seven. It seems in document six as if Christians were universe encouraged to trade as long as it involved God.Religious paintings of Our noblewoman were being asked for, therefore Christians now pauperism people to trade. Also in document six it is stated that, You know God has granted you to acquire great wealth in this world, may He be praised . It is now expected for Christian merchants to trade and use God while doing so. Overtime you can see the change on the views of trade, because at first Christians did not pauperism anyone making a large profit. As for Muslims, merchants are loosing money from trading. In document seven, Sakaoglu Nasuh is an example of how over time the concern activity has affected his ethical customs. The aforementioned(prenominal) has now acted contrary to the old custom. This is because he is buying all the cotton recital and selling them for higher prices. Hence, not cock-a-hoop the other merchants a fair hazard to buy and sell the cotton as well. This is going against what the Islam religion believed, which is business activities are acceptable as long as you are not taking emolument of others. The Islamic Court probably said this is document seven because they wanted to occupy the people and let them know that merchants must obey.The two religions continue to differ in these docume nts because Christians are now persuading people to trade, while Islam trading is becoming monopolized. However, Christianity and Islam are appease alike in which they both use religion as an example. The attitudes of Christianity and Islam towards trade and merchants differed. When the two religions first began, they had opposite views from each other. Christians saw trade and wealth as being far from God and it was not approved. Muslims, on the other hand, tolerated trade as long as the two parties were honest and no one was taken advantage of.Later on, these views changed when Christians became more lenient and also accepted honest trade. Muslims then saw trade as inevitably affecting the soul when merchants became corrupt by outbidding other merchants. However, we would need additional documents such as documents from the common people in order to asses the consequences of the merchant activities. We do not know how the Christians or Muslims commoners viewed the trading busine ss, therefore, we cannot fully understand all aspects of the religions towards it.